Blame view

3rdparty/boost_1_81_0/libs/parameter/test/timings.txt 2.76 KB
73ef4ff3   Hu Chunming   提交三方库
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
  # Copyright David Abrahams 2005. Distributed under the Boost
  # Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying
  # file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
  
  ----------------- Test #1 ----------------
  Testers: 
    Matthias Troyer, Michael Gauckler, David Abrahams
  
  Date:
    2005-09-09
  
  Compiler: 
    Cygwin g++-4.0.0
  
  Command lines:
    g++ -c -o efficiency.o -ftemplate-depth-100 -funroll-loops \
        -O3 -finline-functions -Wno-inline -DNDEBUG  efficiency.cpp
  
    g++ -o efficiency.exe efficiency.o -Wl,--strip-all  
  
    efficiency && efficiency && efficiency
  
  Machine:
    Dell Inspiron 9300
    Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 2.00GHz
    Running on 230 volts AC power
  
  Timings:
    Run #1 results discarded per standard practice
  
    Run #2
    plain time: 0.75
    named parameter time: 0.734
  
    Run #3
    plain time: 0.781
    named parameter time: 0.766
  
  ----------------- Test #2 ----------------
  
  Testers: 
    Chris Frey
  
  Date:
    2005-09-17
  
  Compiler: 
    Linux kernel 2.4.27
    gcc version 3.3.6 (Gentoo 3.3.6, ssp-3.3.6-1.0, pie-8.7.8)
  
  Command lines:
    g++ -c -o efficiency.o -ftemplate-depth-100 -funroll-loops \
        -O3 -finline-functions -Wno-inline -DNDEBUG  efficiency.cpp
  
    g++ -o efficiency.exe efficiency.o -Wl,--strip-all  
  
  Machine:
    IBM Thinkpad 770Z, running on AC power
    Intel Pentium II 366Mhz
  
  Timings:
    Run #1 results discarded per standard practice
  
    Run #2
    plain time:           6.42
    named parameter time: 7.34
  
    Run #3
    plain time:           6.42
    named parameter time: 7.34
  
  ----------------- Test #2 ----------------
  
  Testers: 
    Stuar Dootson
  
  Date:
    2005-09-18
  
  Machine:
    Athlon 64 3500+ laptop, running on AC power
    Windows XP SP2
  
  
  Compiler: Visual C++ 7.1
  
   command line: 
     cl -O2 efficiency.cpp -EHsc -I\lib\boost\include\boost-1_33
  
   Results:
     plain time:           <ignored>
     named parameter time: <ignored>
     plain time:           1.453
     named parameter time: 1.437
     plain time:           1.453
     named parameter time: 1.453
  
  Compiler: Visual C++ 8.0
  
   command-line:
     cl -O2 efficiency.cpp -EHsc -I\lib\boost\include\boost-1_33
  
   Results:
     plain time:           <ignored>
     named parameter time: <ignored>
     plain time:           1.438
     named parameter time: 1.453
     plain time:           1.438
     named parameter time: 1.437
  
  Compiler: Mingw gcc 3.4.2
  
   command-line:
     g++ -c -o efficiency.o -ftemplate-depth-100 -funroll-loops -O3
         -finline-functions -Wno-inline -DNDEBUG  efficiency.cpp
         -I\lib\boost\include\boost-1_33
     g++ -o efficiency.exe efficiency.o -Wl,--strip-all 
  
   Results:
     plain time:           <ignored>
     named parameter time: <ignored>
     plain time:           1.14
     named parameter time: 1.422
     plain time:           1.125
     named parameter time: 1.406
  
  -----------------------------------------